Are employees allowed to discuss arbitral proceedings, its merit and documents disclosure with third parties if they signed an exclusive arbitration agreement? In Pfizer,...
On October 9, 2018 the City and State of New York introduced and enforced an in-depth protocol regarding the prevention, investigation and sanction of sexual harassment in the...
Restricted stocks conferred to employees, that is stocks that employees can transfer after vesting, are subject to certain tax rules that distinguish them from granted or fully...
The most recently published data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) prove the strength of the American economy, with a GDP that shows a growth of 3.2% in the third...
The National Defense Authorization Act, introduced for the 2019 fiscal year, has updated and broadened the powers of the Commission on Foreign Investments in the United States...
On May 21, 2018 The Supreme Court of the United States established a relevant principle in terms of hourly compensation in labor contracts and alternative conflict resolution in...
I dati piu’ recenti pubblicati dal Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) registrano la solidità del quadro economico degli Stati Uniti, con un PIL che evidenzia, nel terzo trimestre...
Per l’anno fiscale 2019 e’ stato introdotto il “National Defense Authorization Act”, che ha rinnovato ed ampliato i poteri della Commissione sugli investimenti stranieri negli...
Are employees allowed to discuss arbitral proceedings, its merit and documents disclosure with third parties if they signed an exclusive arbitration agreement? In Pfizer, Inc., (Case 10-CA-175850) an administrative law judge of the National Labor Relation Board (NLRB) ruled that a confidentiality obligation within the employment arbitration clause is prohibited under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). Pfizer did not apply Epic System Corp. v. Lewis (584 U.S. ___ (2018)) and/or AT&T Mobility LLC v. Conception (563 U.S. 333 (2011)) stating that both cases did not control. In Epic the US Supreme Court confirmed the validity of an arbitration clause that bars employees under collective contracts from filing a class action.
The ALJ argument rests on the distinction between procedural and substantive right analysis: Epic allowed employees to be limited by a mere procedural right (as a class); on the contrary, it seems that Employees cannot be limited in their substantive right to discuss their cases with third parties. More litigation is underway shaping the final judicial determination.
Pending this litigation, employers are encouraged to carefully review their arbitration clauses and its confidentiality statements.