Melchionna PLLC

Navigation

Recent Posts


  • The New U.S. Tariffs Regime Introduced on April 2, 2025. An Intro.
  • Artificial Intelligence and the legal profession
  • Melchionna PLLC and Grimaldi Alliance
  • How AI Works and AI Liability
  • Crypto Litigation: an update

Who we are – Practice Areas


  • About us
  • Alcohol Law
  • Art law
  • Business law
  • Fashion law
  • Finance and banking
  • Food law
  • International tax
  • International trade
  • Internet Law
  • M&A and corporate law
  • Money laundering
  • Tax Law
  • Technology law
  • Trademark law

Melchionna Copyright 2019

Hydra WordPress Theme by EckoThemes.

Published with WordPress.

Related Articles

Filter by Category

  • Business law(19)
  • M&A and corporate law(15)
  • Food law(13)
  • International trade(10)
  • Technology law(8)
  • International tax(8)
  • Internet Law(5)
  • Tax Law(5)
  • Alcohol Law(5)
  • About us(4)
  • Finance and banking(4)
  • Money laundering(3)
  • Art law(2)
  • Fashion law(1)
  • Trademark law(1)

Filter by Author

  • iulia@plus972group.com (17)
  • lcmm@melchionnalaw.com (56)
Back to Latest Articles
About us

Melchionna PLLC, a law firm with a focus on business, corporate, tax, and IP law.

About us Melchionna PLLC represents and assists North American and European business clients in achieving their goals with sound legal advice and innovative solutions to current...

Posted on 18th February 2019 by lcmm@melchionnalaw.com

About us

People

Avv. Flavia Betti Tonini, PhD, Of Counsel Flavia Betti Tonini is an experienced attorney with a solid background in corporate law, compliance, criminal law, and...

Posted on 13th January 2023 by lcmm@melchionnalaw.com

About us

Mission and Values

Mission Melchionna PLLC is an indipendent law firm. Melchionna PLLC’s mission is to provide outstanding legal services and tax advice. We focus on building a relationship with...

Posted on 5th November 2019 by lcmm@melchionnalaw.com

M&A and corporate law

Careful drafting of confidentiality duty clause within employment arbitration context

Are employees allowed to discuss arbitral proceedings, its merit and documents disclosure with third parties if they signed an exclusive arbitration agreement? In Pfizer,...

Posted on 20th April 2019 by lcmm@melchionnalaw.com

Alcohol Law

Tennessee: alcohol protectionist statute under scrutiny before the US Supreme Court

Tennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Association v. Thomas, (SCOTUS Docket No. 18-96), whose US Supreme Court Decision is set to be announced in June 2019, asks the Justices to...

Posted on 20th April 2019 by lcmm@melchionnalaw.com

M&A and corporate law

Sexual Harassment in the Workplace

On October 9, 2018 the City and State of New York introduced and enforced an in-depth protocol regarding the prevention, investigation and sanction of sexual harassment in the...

Posted on 11th February 2019 by iulia@plus972group.com

M&A and corporate law

Section 83(b) Election

Restricted stocks conferred to employees, that is stocks that employees can transfer after vesting, are subject to certain tax rules that distinguish them from granted or fully...

Posted on 11th February 2019 by iulia@plus972group.com

International tax

Collecting Sales Tax For Long Distance Sales of Artwork is Mandatory

In South Dakota v. Wayfair et al., (585 U.S. ___, 2018) the Supreme Court of the United State has overturned a precedent previously established in Qill Corp. V. North Dakota...

Posted on 11th February 2019 by iulia@plus972group.com

International tax

Corporate Reorganization for Tax Purposes: The US Tax Court Has Reclassified the Payment of Consulting Fees as a Distribution of Dividends to Shareholders

In Pacific Management Group et al. v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo 2018-131), the Tax Court has established that a reorganization with the intent of postponing tax payments on a flow...

Posted on 11th February 2019 by iulia@plus972group.com

M&A and corporate law

The State of the American Economy– The M&A Market is Taking Off for Small to Medium Sized Businesses

The most recently published data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) prove the strength of the American economy, with a GDP that shows a growth of 3.2% in the third...

Posted on 11th February 2019 by iulia@plus972group.com

M&A and corporate law

FIRRMA, Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act: Investing in the USA Will Become More Difficult in Key Sectors

The National Defense Authorization Act, introduced for the 2019 fiscal year, has updated and broadened the powers of the Commission on Foreign Investments in the United States...

Posted on 11th February 2019 by iulia@plus972group.com

Food law

FDA – Drug Supply Chain Security

The FDA has recently finalized some regulations regarding the Drug Supply Chain Security Act (DSCSA). The goal is to help companies that operate in the pharmaceutical industry...

Posted on 11th February 2019 by iulia@plus972group.com

View Latest Posts
M&A and corporate law

Careful drafting of confidentiality duty clause within employment arbitration context


lcmm@melchionnalaw.com
Careful drafting of confidentiality duty...
Posted on 20th April 2019 by lcmm@melchionnalaw.com

Are employees allowed to discuss arbitral proceedings, its merit and documents disclosure with third parties if they signed an exclusive arbitration agreement? In Pfizer, Inc., (Case 10-CA-175850) an administrative law judge of the National Labor Relation Board (NLRB) ruled that a confidentiality obligation within the employment arbitration clause is prohibited under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). Pfizer did not apply Epic System Corp. v. Lewis (584 U.S. ___ (2018)) and/or AT&T Mobility LLC v. Conception (563 U.S. 333 (2011)) stating that both cases did not control. In Epic the US Supreme Court confirmed the validity of an arbitration clause that bars employees under collective contracts from filing a class action.

The ALJ argument rests on the distinction between procedural and substantive right analysis: Epic allowed employees to be limited by a mere procedural right (as a class); on the contrary, it seems that Employees cannot be limited in their substantive right to discuss their cases with third parties. More litigation is underway shaping the final judicial determination.

Pending this litigation, employers are encouraged to carefully review their arbitration clauses and its confidentiality statements.

The information provided here does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice but simply information for general purposes only and may not be the most up to date. Use of our website or any of its links or resources do not create an attorney-client relationship between the reader, user, or browser and the law firm. The views expressed at, or through, this site are those of the individual authors writing in their individual capacities only.

lcmm@melchionnalaw.com
  • Share Article:
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit